Arizona Child Support Update

The Arizona legislature is in the process of reviewing the Arizona Child Support Guidelines. This review process occurs approximately every 4 years in order to insure that the Arizona Child Support Guidelines are in sync with the current economic situation.  The review process is required by federal law, which requires states to have child support lawsthat are: (a) applicable state wide; (b) take into consideration the non-custodial parents earnings and income; (c) are based on specific numeric and descriptive criteria; (d) results in a computation of the child support obligation; and (e) are reviewed and if necessary, revised, at least once every four years.

It is appears that there will be changes to the maximum combined gross income for child support and there will be changes to definitions to gross income when calculating Arizona child support awards. For example, one proposal is to indicate that cash value may be assigned to in-kind or other non-cash benefits for recurring contributions from any sources that reduce living expenses as opposed to making that a "shall" provision. A revised chart is being proposed for use in terms of defining adjustments for support of other children. These would be children for which the parent is legally obligated to support including children being supported by court order. There will also be provisions as proposed in the new guidelines to discuss situations when a parent's income as the obligor is over $12,000 monthly. Recognition of possible changes to Arizona Child Support Guidelines is important.

As more information becomes available, we will continue to let you know how these changes could affect you.  In the meantime, if you need any assistance with Arizona child support issues, contact Nirenstein Garnice Soderquist PLC.

 

Arizona Child Support

In Arizona, the legislature has indicated that the goal of the Arizona child support statute is to ensure that the amount of child support ordered approximates what would have been spent on a child if the family remained intact and were living together.  The Arizona child support guidelines were created to establish a standard and uniform method for calculating child support.  The Guidelines apply to all children and parents in Arizona and are only deviated from under special circumstances.

If you would like more information on Arizona child support, please contact Nirenstein Garnice Soderquist PLC.

 The Arizona Court of Appeals recently rendered a decision dealing with the issue of Arizona child support.  In East v. Matthews, the Arizona Court of Appeals reaffirmed that the standard of living that the child would have enjoyed had the family remained intact and lived together applies to all children, whether the parents were married at one time or were never married (paternity cases). The court also held that a parent seeking a monetary award greater that what would be presumtively correct under the Arizona Child Support Guidelines must prove to the trial court why an increase in the child support award would be in the child's best interests.  One way for a parent to do this would be to establish what standard of living the child would have enjoyed if the parents relationship remained intact and both the parents and the child resided together.


Other factors can also impact the child support calculation in Arizona. For example, the definition of gross income and adjusted gross income as used in the Guidelines do not have the same meaning as when they are used for tax purposes. Gross income for child support calculation purposes includes income from any source and may include but is not limited to income from salaries, wages, commissions, bonuses, dividends, severance pay, pensions, interest, trust income, annuities, capital gains, social security benefits, workers compensation benefits, unemployment insurance benefits, disability insurance benefits, recurring gifts, prizes and spousal maintenance (alimony). Also, cash value shall be assigned to in-kind or other non-cash benefits. Normally, the Court will not attribute income greater than that which would have been earned from full time employment. Each parent shall have the right to choose to work additional hours through overtime or at a second job without increasing the child support award.

Defining income is not always easy. In the case of Hetherington v. Hetherington, the trial court was instructed that it must consider the amount an employer contributes toward a party's benefits in determining a party's income for purposes of computing child support. Benefits that must be considered include contributions to retirement income and health insurance. Workers compensation insurance contributions do not need to be considered. The trial court may consider a deviation from the child support guidelines if the inclusion of the benefits would artificially inflate a parent's income. One particular element of the child support calculation formula concerns a situation in which child support is paid for two children and the oldest child is emancipated. Does the child support amount automatically decrease in light of a parent's continuing duty to pay child support for the remaining minor child? The answer is no. In the case of Guerra v. Bejarano, the appellate court determined that in such a situation the parent was required to make a written request to the Court for modification of child support and in so doing, allow the Court to apply the child support guidelines to calculate a new child support obligation. Statutes prohibiting retroactive modification of child support to a date prior to the date in which a written request for modification is filed, means in effect that a parent paying child support should not simply assume that child support will automatically be decreased when the oldest child is emancipated. The support payor must be proactive in filing the request to recalculate child support.

Arizona Divorce, Arizona Child Custody and Arizona Child Support -- Temporary Orders Hearing

Temporary Orders in Arizona Family Court

What kind of temporary orders you can get in Arizona family court, and how.

Typically Arizona divorce and custody cases take months to make it to court. But if you're getting divorced and need a quick decision from a judge about who gets the kids, the car, the money in the bank accounts, or the house -- or if you need money for support right away -- obviously you can't wait that long.

You don't have to. When couples separate, important issues are often resolved in a short evidentiary hearing before a judge, instead of requiring a full-scale trial.

Even though these hearings are shorter than trials, their brevity means that you must be prepared and know exactly what you want. You may have only a few minutes to ask for it.

What Temporary Orders Are For

Let's say a husband moves out, and the wife who's left behind needs money to feed and shelter the children. Realizing that her children would starve long before a full trial could be held, she is desperate for help. She can go to court to request a temporary order from an Arizona family court judge, even though a formal divorce action has not yet been set for trial and discovery may not have been completed, or for that matter, even started. Her request will be put on a fast track, and an evidentiary hearing will be scheduled within weeks in most cases.

Spouses can also ask the Arizona family court to temporarily: 

  • restrain a spouse from coming near or contacting the other (or, if he or she hasn't already done so, to move out of the family home)
  • establish child custody and visiting arrangements
  • provide for spousal support (alimony) and/or child support payments
  • order either spouse not to sell valuable assets, and/or
  • give possession of the family home or car to one of the spouses.

These temporary orders are usually valid until the court holds another hearing or until the spouses arrive at their own settlement through negotiation or mediation.

When to Ask for a Temporary Order

When someone moves out of the house, one of you should go to court right away to quickly resolve any critical issues, such as spousal support. And, if the children will be staying with you, you should immediately file for custody and child support.

This accomplishes two things. First, you will be awarded the proper amount of child support and the court will acknowledge that you live with the children -- often granting physical custody right off the bat. Second, your spouse cannot successfully claim that the children were kidnapped. This may sound extreme and unlike your future ex-spouse, but some people behave uncharacteristically when under duress and feeling threatened. And, if your future ex-spouse raises such a claim, the police or judge are usually obligated to hear her or him out. However, when you arrive with proof that you filed for custody and child support, the court will most likely dismiss a kidnapping claim.

How to Ask for a Temporary Order

To get a court order, you must prepare and file some paperwork. Here's what you'll probably need 

  • A request for the court order you want.
     
  • A supporting affidavit. This is a written statement, under penalty of perjury, setting out facts that legally justify the issuance of the temporary order -- for example, the need for money to support your children. You can also submit declarations of other people who have first-hand knowledge of the facts.
     
  • A proposed temporary order granting you the relief requested. This order will be signed by the family court judge if he or she grants the relief you request.
     
  • A proof of service. This is a document that proves to the court that the papers have been properly delivered to your spouse.

What to Expect at the Hearing

Your next step is to attend the court hearing where the jArizona family court udge will consider your request. In emergencies, the hearing can be held within a few days.

The judge will:

  • review the details of the requests and the underlying facts
  • possibly ask you some questions
  • ask your spouse, if present, for his or her side of the story, and
  • in child support cases, refer to state guidelines on recommended support, given factors such as each spouse's income and who has primary custody of the kids.

At its conclusion, the Arizona family court judge will likely make a ruling, usually either issuing the temporary order you requested or modifying it somewhat. Orders such as these stay in effect only until the divorce is finally settled, either through a trial or when you and your spouse reach an agreement.

Nurse Dissapears After Child Support Win

NEW YORK (CNN) -- Nonnie Dotson, a nurse in the U.S. Air Force, was decompressing from a hard-fought child support battle when she disappeared hundreds of miles from her home base.

Dotson, 33, was staying with her brother at his home outside Denver, Colorado, when she vanished on November 19, 2006. She was supposed to meet friends at the mall for a smoothie.

She never showed.

The single mother and her 16-month-old daughter, Savannah, lived in San Antonio, Texas, where Dotson worked on a military base as an intensive care nurse. They were staying with Dotson's brother, Tony, for a few days. Video Watch why Dotson's disappearance puzzles investigators »

Dotson had recently emerged from a court battle with Ed Vehle, Savannah's father. Vehle, who also lived in San Antonio, was ordered by the court to pay $10,000 in back child support, as well as $900 each month. Dotson won the court order two months before she disappeared.

Dotson was just months away from completing her military duty and was trying to decide whether she would move back to her hometown in Colorado or remain in San Antonio.

"She asked me to look after Savannah for a couple hours and she walked out that door and we never saw her again," Tony Dotson added. "She would never have intentionally left Savannah behind like that." Police agree.

Since Dotson vanished, there has been no activity on her bank accounts, credit cards or cell phone, police said. Her case is still an open missing persons investigation being handled by the Jefferson County homicide department.

"Unfortunately, we have no real leads as to who is responsible for Dotson's disappearance," said sheriff's office spokeswoman Jacki Kelley.

"She could be alive and being held against her will. She could have been kidnapped and then murdered. We are not ruling anything out at this time," Kelley said.

For several weeks after Dotson's disappearance, Vehle refused to answer questions. He retained counsel. In mid-December 2006, Vehle and Jay Norton, his attorney, met with police, answering all their questions.

Norton said they were able to provide investigators with receipts and cell phone records accounting for Vehle's whereabouts. Police confirmed that Vehle was nowhere near Colorado before, during or after Dotson's disappearance.

After Dotson's disappearance, Vehle decided to go to court to pursue full custody of his daughter. Dotson's parents had been taking care of Savannah. The court last year gave Vehle shared custody with Dotson's parents.

Family and police urge anyone with information about the whereabouts of Nonnie Dotson to call the Jefferson County Sheriff's Office tip line at (303) 271-5612.

Arizona Family Law