Interspousal Agreements -- Patent Application -- Ownership

The Arizona Court of Appeals held that the divorce court did not err in rejecting a husband's claim that under the parties' marital settlement agreement he is entitled to ownership of a patent application that lists the wife as the sole inventor.

Upholding an award of the application to the wife, Chief Judge John Pelander noted that while federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over questions of patent validity and infringement, the question of who owns the patent rights is typically a question for state courts. He observed that case law makes clear that the patent right initially vests in the inventor, who may then transfer that right to another.

Click here to read the full opinion.

Substantial Abuse Standard Applies To 'Good Cause' Finding Under ICWA

The standard for reviewing a state court's finding that good cause exists to deviate from the placement preferences set out in the Indian Child Welfare Act is substantial abuse of discretion, the Kansas Supreme Court decided in In re Adoption of B.G.J., Kan., No. 91997, 4/28/06). Addressing the issue for the first time, the court rejected use of the de novo standard, and said that the standard it adopted gives "considerable discretion" to the trial court's findings of fact.

Continue Reading...